Accountability for misconduct

The persistent theme of prosecutorial misconduct, especially in cases of withheld evidence, is the lack of personal accountability. It is possible for a conviction to be overturned in a case where evidence inconsistent with guilt has been withheld, though it is not a certainty, but even in cases where evidence has been tampered with or destroyed (as in the case of Kevin Cooper, who has exhausted his appeals and awaits execution on death row in California – NBC News), there is no real personal consequence for the attorney responsible. In the absence of professional or criminal consequence, relying entirely on the good conscience and moral character of prosecuting attorneys, in a profession and a culture that places value on “wins” and “toughness” is unlikely to change or reduce the rate of wrongful convictions inherent in the system.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s